The Truth About Brian Jenner's Dismissal

[splitpin]

Pay attention, TwistedStupor: There's a huge difference between sensationalism in the media and reporting credible facts, whether in the media or a public forum. Erroneous and self-serving speculation causes undue harm to people. Pffft. Even a blonde knows that!

 

Sorry, Cap. Did not know that. Hugs for you and Missus V.

 

I'm glad to see someone else in TQNs gunsight instead of me

[iceman88]

Hello everyone..

 

I have been reading the conversations that have been going on since Brian has Posted his letter. I have actually been up to date with the hole story since it started through sources that are vary reliable.

So 1st off I would like to say is read Mark 12:28-31.

Brian I have never heard anything except that you are one of the Best straight up guys around and that you know the legal side of things and political side of things more then most in HAC.

I know a man that stood up in Calgary this last week at HAC and challenged the Board by asking them what information they based their decision to dismiss you .. They quickly said that they couldn't talk about it and that it.

The reason this man asked this was because he said that, " How can I as a member of the HAC agree to their decisions when they won't tell us what they base their decisions on??"

 

You see at the end of a meeting with all the members of HAC and the Board it's self they say " Now would someone please 2nd the motion for all the ratifications of the last years decisions be agreed on." Something like that which pretty much means ( does everyone agree that we made the right decisions in the last year? They are supposed to ask if anyone want's to discuss this or not, but I guess they forgot. So this man from the beginning of the story had to Yell from the BACK of the hall and ask if they could discuss this motion before it was passed. After he was don asking all the questions and got NO answers he stepped down and the motion was passed like he never said a thing...

 

So From everything I’ve heard and witnessed on this page I have come to a conclusion. Most people who post about this subject don’t have a clue to what's going on.

The real reason for the dismissal is not known and was not given to you . It Doesn't matter who you work for or what you do being dismissed without just cause is illegal and the board well pay.

 

I wish you all the best Brian and am sure we well meet one one day..

God Bless iceman88

[Skids Up]

They quickly said that they couldn't talk about it and that it.

 

No, what they said was that they were under legal advisement from their council not to discuss the matter because of the threatened lawsuit by Brian Jenner.

 

If you are going to quote, get it all in there...

[Skidz]

Well, I think anyone with an IQ above 20 can figure that Mr. Jenner's dismissal isn't just about the moose hunting incident. Obviously there are other factors leading to this. As in any organisation of HAC's nature, there can be divisions among it's members. There can be regional differences, commercial rivalries, personnal differences between members of the board, outside influence, etc. We don't know what caused the board to first renew Mr. Jenner's contract, then suspend him and then dismiss him, all in a 3 month period. That's politics for you...

 

All we can hope for as an industry is that if this thing does go to court, that it doesn't destroy HAC altogether. My intuition tells me this will eventually be settled out of court, and we'll probably never really know what happened...

[TwistedSpar]

Well, I think anyone with an IQ above 20 can figure that Mr. Jenner's dismissal isn't just about the moose hunting incident. Obviously there are other factors leading to this. As in any organisation of HAC's nature, there can be divisions among it's members. There can be regional differences, commercial rivalries, personnal differences between members of the board, outside influence, etc. We don't know what caused the board to first renew Mr. Jenner's contract, then suspend him and then dismiss him, all in a 3 month period. That's politics for you...

 

All we can hope for as an industry is that if this thing does go to court, that it doesn't destroy HAC altogether. My intuition tells me this will eventually be settled out of court, and we'll probably never really know what happened...

 

that would be alot of speculating there skidz.

 

there could be more to it, or it could be black and white, knee jerk/back against the wall reaction.

 

Both sides aren't playing all there cards, they are holding back the aces for the courts.

[TwistedSpar]

Pay attention, TwistedStupor: There's a huge difference between sensationalism in the media and reporting credible facts, whether in the media or a public forum. Erroneous and self-serving speculation causes undue harm to people. Pffft. Even a blonde knows that!

 

Sorry, Cap. Did not know that. Hugs for you and Missus V.

 

wow TQN actually missed the point i was making.... :punk:

[Icewind]

No, what they said was that they were under legal advisement from their council not to discuss the matter because of the threatened lawsuit by Brian Jenner.

 

If you are going to quote, get it all in there...

Yup. And Randy was prepared to present the minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors on the subject. It is reasonable to expect that at some time in the future they will be made available to the HAC members.

[transquebecniece]

wow TQN actually missed the point i was making.... :punk:

Yeah, well. It happens. Try to be more clear and concise next time, will ya? :bleh: