Jump to content

Notice: Effective July 1, 2024, Vertical Forums will be officially shut down. As a result, all forum activity will be permanently removed. We understand that this news may come as a disappointment, but we would like to thank everyone for being a part of our community for so many years.

If you are interested in taking over this Forum, please contact us prior to July 1.

Flight Time Vs. Air Time Personal Logbook


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

I have been involved in ELD’s “electronic logging devices” in commercial vehicles. These work very well and will be mandatory June 01 2020. They are now branching out into commercial aircraft and this will take out all the guess work and increase safety eliminating any “cheating” or mistakes in pilot , journey and tech logs. There is alot of interest from customers including government agencies. Shouldn’t take long as all the ground work is done with trucks etc. Should make things a lot safer and less confusing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RonnyRotor said:

I have been involved in ELD’s “electronic logging devices” in commercial vehicles. These work very well and will be mandatory June 01 2020. They are now branching out into commercial aircraft and this will take out all the guess work and increase safety eliminating any “cheating” or mistakes in pilot , journey and tech logs. There is alot of interest from customers including government agencies. Shouldn’t take long as all the ground work is done with trucks etc. Should make things a lot safer and less confusing. 

 

Ya, they exist already in various forms for the aviation sector.  Still not that cost effective and not even 100% accurate either.

Since there are way more trucks on the road with a rampant logging deficiency problem it's justified for that sector.  Won't make the trucks any safer but will prevent most drivers from breaking the law.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned, ELDs exist in a variety of forms in our industry already. Unfortunately, it appears that the confusion that exists within Transport Canada, also existed within TC certification when the devices were approved. As an example: Some devices log  air time as only the time spent in the air (Which is correct), while others continue to log air time, after landing, while on the ground with engines running. This results in higher than actual air time records, and is unnecessarily increasing maintenance costs as time expired parts are required to be replaced early. The difference can be significant on flights, with multiple landings, between start and shut down (which are very common in our industry).

Also, not all maintenance tasks are required to be completed in advance of time limits. Many special inspections, like torque checks must be completed after a miniMum number of hours IN THE AIR. So if the device is logging air time, while the aircraft is running on the ground, there exists potential for these inspections/tasks to be completed before they have actually met the minimum air time requirements (and contrary to the manufacturers Recommendations and the airworthiness regulations).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...