Grasshopper Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 That's what I thought, Phil. Many of us on this continent, however, feel that ICAO, despite all it's good, is taking on too much of a 'UN persona' for the overall good of the industry. Isn't the mantra, "If it's American, it can't be good?" Also, if you read my post, you'd have seen that TC have, indeed, defined the 'built-up area,' questionable though the definition may be. The more lawyers and politicos involved in it, the worse it will be - guaranteed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pilot5 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Well I tend to agree if you consider the US contribution to the ICAO budget! having worked directly with ICAO TCB back in the early 90's these definitions are designed with US standards in mind then are miraculously supposed to be considered over the broader spectrum including lesser developed nation states. This is were the French an and such firms like Bureau Veritas tried to seize the regulatory consultancy market! But what do I know ? P5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Croucher Posted February 14, 2012 Report Share Posted February 14, 2012 "The more lawyers and politicos involved in it, the worse it will be - guaranteed. " Too true - this is where you enter the murky world of JAA/EASA. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazy Posted February 18, 2012 Report Share Posted February 18, 2012 I have no shame. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2012/02/17/north-power-repair-update.html watch video. H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.