Jump to content

Questions About Tail Rotors.


tDawe

Recommended Posts

I know there was a link posted here at some point about tail rotor aerodynamics, but I can't find it, so I'm going to float a question I have about tail rotors, maybe someone can enlighten me.

 

 

1.) When I look at Sikorsky's S92 and UH60 the tail rotor is on the wrong side, but the blades still turn counter clockwise? Is there an aerodynamic advantage to turning the tail rotor around to the right hand side of the tail boom? Is there much difference between the tail rotor is acting as a "pusher" or a "puller"?

 

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who can enlighten me so I can sleep at night.

 

tDawe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a guy who's used to be on a team of Bell disign engineers, and is now a pilot. I'll email him to try to get an informed answer.

 

Postulating out loud....:unsure:

 

The tail rotor on the left side draws its air from around the vertical fin which may cause a disruption of smooth airflow. Putting the thing on the other side may give it more undisturbed airflow and therefore a tad more efficiency. It may also decrease the interferance of the main rotor vortices with a wind from the 10 o'clock position.

 

I believe having the tail rotor turn so the forward travelling (to the nose) blade is at the top helps with perfomance as this blade is moving upward through clean air outside of the downwash from the main rotor blades in the hover. Robinson changed their thinking in the transition from the R22 to the R44. R22 tail rotors spin clockwise (looking from the left side of the aircraft) and the R44's go the other way.

 

As a side note/question....:wacko:

 

On the newer designs the manufacturers also canter the vertical fin to one side or t'other. Any ideas as to why this may be?

 

Regards

 

RH1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a guy who's used to be on a team of Bell disign engineers, and is now a pilot. I'll email him to try to get an informed answer.

 

Postulating out loud....:unsure:

 

The tail rotor on the left side draws its air from around the vertical fin which may cause a disruption of smooth airflow. Putting the thing on the other side may give it more undisturbed airflow and therefore a tad more efficiency. It may also decrease the interferance of the main rotor vortices with a wind from the 10 o'clock position.

 

I believe having the tail rotor turn so the forward travelling (to the nose) blade is at the top helps with perfomance as this blade is moving upward through clean air outside of the downwash from the main rotor blades in the hover. Robinson changed their thinking in the transition from the R22 to the R44. R22 tail rotors spin clockwise (looking from the left side of the aircraft) and the R44's go the other way.

 

As a side note/question....:wacko:

 

On the newer designs the manufacturers also canter the vertical fin to one side or t'other. Any ideas as to why this may be?

 

Regards

 

RH1

 

that is to add a vertical component to the thrust vector of the t/r. helps the machine lift more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...