Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
hot and high

Euro Crushes Bell

Recommended Posts

Ya, cause most of the work is up there???

 

The B3e starts outperforming 212's at 6,000 ft or lower depending on density altitude. Lots of work up there!

 

Judging by your screen name however, I doubt you care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the name of the manufacturer, it was still some pretty good flying.

 

However, we should note that a Bell 212 will outperform a B3 if the aircraft is 2000 feet above the ocean, 50 miles from shore, with one engine inoperative.

 

Would you laugh at a North Sea oil rig pilot just because he can't longline at 25,000 feet. Of course not.

My point is, just like pilots, each aircraft prefers different types of work.

 

Get over it. Give credit were it is due, and don't boast about success.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little over dramatic but I agree with the overall point of your post. The "Get over it" is a little much. This is aviation history, not just some random accomplishment. Someone's life was saved and in the course of it a new world record was set. Sounds all right to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The B3e starts outperforming 212's at 6,000 ft or lower depending on density altitude. Lots of work up there!

 

Judging by your screen name however, I doubt you care.

Depends on how many people you want to carry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing a 214B couldn't handle if given the chance.

 

 

I believe 25 000' is higher than the 214's service ceiling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you fly an aircraft above it's service ceiling and do something amazing, even saved someone's life, the way the operator would likely be thanked upon landing is with the suspension of their operating certificate maybe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Impressive accomplishment by an excellent aircraft not to mention the skill required by the pilot. Eurocopter and bell both have positive and negative points, that's why jobs specifications ask for specific aircraft. Performance is not usually a factor when comparing a twin engine medium to a single engine intermediate. They all have their place in the industry as do we as pilots. If I want to fly a specific type, which I do, I will choose my employer accordingly. I'm sure we all have our preferences.

 

The 214 is a very good performer at altitude thanks to the massive compressor and 33" wide blades. I'm sure if a 214 was present rather than a B3 it could have carried out the rescue although it would have burnt far more fuel (1000lbs per hour or 660L) I believe if bell ever discontinues manufacturing the fuel lines to the engine a garden hose would do the trick!!

 

Safe flying to all,

 

R

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...