Jump to content

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, bigD said:

Longline,  You may want to educate yourself on the definition of asymptomatic. It will help you understand the post you are referring to.

I would like to be educated....please post the studies that support your claim.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

🤷‍♂️

OK... that's it.... I think we have reached the usefulness of this thread and I am closing it... if admin, who is higher on the chain than me want's to re-open it, have at it... but as far as I am con

Hi GrayHorizons,   I’m sorry to hear about your mother. I hope she sees the other side of cancer as a survivor.  I agree with everything in your post but I would add one thing. Should y

Posted Images

12 minutes ago, bigD said:

What claim? No study needed. It’s a word get a dictionary. 

So let me get this right....everyone in the world is suppose to wake up...reach over and grab a q-stick ( purchased by BIG Pharma ) and put it up their nose to see if they are  sick.  And then and only then you know you are sick.   This sounds like an infinite loop that you can't get out of...something someone who is trying to control you would tell you!!!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Longline said:

So let me get this right....everyone in the world is suppose to wake up...reach over and grab a q-stick ( purchased by BIG Pharma ) and put it up their nose to see if they are  sick.  And then and only then you know you are sick.   This sounds like an infinite loop that you can't get out of...something someone who is trying to control you would tell you!!!

not everyone obviously.

This guy doesnt need a q-tip

image.png.c62caeb12bb0263f59263f993454de8f.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chopterlol said:

Yea this 99% survival rate virus is SO bad you have to take a test to know if your sick.

 

Ok 

I know the 99% isnt the true number, but thats not what I'm going to query you about.

 

Why do you think it is such a favorable number? why do you think "99%" survive?

do you think that any of the steps taken to this date have improved or maintained the survivability? 

where do you think the world would be if this virus was left to itself with no attempt to slow it down? Should we try that? do you think that's a good idea?

there's many steps and variables....please feel free to open your mind to them. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, GrayHorizons said:

not everyone obviously.

This guy doesnt need a q-tip

image.png.c62caeb12bb0263f59263f993454de8f.png

Obviously this person knows they are sick!!!  We were talking about people who do NOT know they are sick!     Try thinking instead of lashing out!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Longline said:

Obviously this person knows they are sick!!!  We were talking about people who do NOT know they are sick!     Try thinking instead of lashing out!

sorry, i didnt mean to come off so harshly to you. I hope you'll be ok. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, chopterlol said:

John hopkins lists canada as having a 1.7% mortality rate. So 98%, sorry.

 

Thats inline with my daily risk anaylsis matrix :)

John Hopkins is a University....Universities get their money from Government .... Governments launder money for the Elite.     Mortality rate is Not survival rate!  I would love to see your daily risk analysis  matrix....would you please share?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...