Jump to content

Contrail’s Authority???


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Pool pilot said:

1...  Fred

2....  got nothing 

3... still got nothing 

Lets not go sideways on this post...It's about the restrictions contrail is enforcing on our industry, with pilot magic experience numbers and deciding what is to old  an airframe to be flying in Canada. I can understand how some operators may be reluctant to comment on anything to do with contrail for fear of being blackballed and then Contrail having a vendetta against them. I am not going to let this issue go to rest. Any operator that has info about their experience good or bad with the magic contrail experience numbers and older airframes not being on the "contrail List" of acceptable airframes then feel free to pm me and I will post these experience without naming the company suppling the facts. Something seriously has to be done, I refuse to put my head in the sand and pretend that what they say is gospel according to safety.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Full On said:

Lets not go sideways on this post...It's about the restrictions contrail is enforcing on our industry, with pilot magic experience numbers and deciding what is to old  an airframe to be flying in Canada. I can understand how some operators may be reluctant to comment on anything to do with contrail for fear of being blackballed and then Contrail having a vendetta against them. I am not going to let this issue go to rest. Any operator that has info about their experience good or bad with the magic contrail experience numbers and older airframes not being on the "contrail List" of acceptable airframes then feel free to pm me and I will post these experience without naming the company suppling the facts. Something seriously has to be done, I refuse to put my head in the sand and pretend that what they say is gospel according to safety.

You are so very right about not letting this go sideways. 

I apologize and will not harm this thread again with a stupid comment like I did here.

Again.... my sincere apologies. 

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pool pilot said:

You are so very right about not letting this go sideways. 

I apologize and will not harm this thread again with a stupid comment like I did here.

Again.... my sincere apologies. 

Dan

No worries Dan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Full On said:

No worries Dan. 

Thanks.

But you are trying to do a good thing here for the industry and our Canadian low time pilots.

You don't need this to go into a mud slinging mess.

I will back you where I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pool pilot said:

Thanks.

But you are trying to do a good thing here for the industry and our Canadian low time pilots.

You don't need this to go into a mud slinging mess.

I will back you where I can.

Much appreciated.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, simpleton said:

Because Contrail's standards are not really Contrail's standards.....they're Contrail's clients standards. Contrail gets delegated and paid to conduct audits on their behalf so that they do not need to have their own dedicated aviation auditors on staff.

So, if you want to complain, call Cenovus, and CNRL, and Pembina ,and Encana, and Chevron, and CNOOC, and...........

Got any contact info?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...