Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ryan

Exec Helicopters...

Recommended Posts

----------------

On 6/18/2003 4:53:26 PM CTD wrote:

 

 

No, that was a 1-900 number....

 

----------------

I understood the 1-900 was for the better half. She-TD.

 

BIG SMILE. ( I can''t get them to work)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good one Blackie. She-who-must-be-obeyed got a kick out of that.

 

Phil - yes, those are the squids, to whom I was referring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phil, that WAS pointed out above, by both CTD and myself, but the manufacturers of these birds know EXACTLY what their market is and do NOT (nor are they forced to) take adequately into consideration that stark reality.

 

SHAME on them, just as on Frank Robinson and Art Young. It smacks too much of the Ford Pinto philosophy to me, where management made the judgement that it would cost less to pay the forecast fatality claims than to change the design. Revenue AT ALL COSTS, but safety AT AS LITTLE COST AS POSSIBLE. If this is what the great entrepreneurial spirit has brought us, I say TO **** WITH IT!

 

DEMAND SAFETY at the design and manufacturing level, and then at the maintenance, training and operating levels - ALL THE WAY - NOT just with the end users.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...