Plinko Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 I have a lot of time in a 206L on floats - at low altitudes ( being a flatlander and all) If you flew it by the numbers it was not too bad the L-1 was better. A G-2 on floats was a ground based simulator with myself and a certain instructor called "Outo Al" As the RedDawg said anything at + 50 + 55 was a lazy dawg. Landed an IFR equiped 212 with tired - 3s @ 8000 ft + 24 - no wind - ( 10800 DA) now that was unfun. When I got back some said :'How was yer flight?' My reply:"Topping old Chap! Just topping!!" All you guys who regularily fly in mountains for a living got my respect. Silly ******** all of you! :up: If only we had a terrain avoidance system...work would be so much safer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkbait Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 If only we had a terrain avoidance system...work would be so much safer! Sorry Plinko but I do not understand that comment. Is it a failed attempt at humour? Did "we" ever work together? Did I intimate that flying the 47 G-2, 206L, 206L1 on floats or 212 with -3s in the hills was unsafe? Did I state that some of them did or did not have a terrain avoidance system? Have you, perhaps, mistaken this thread for another? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.