Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've heard this dicussion a few times. "We used to use a 100' and that was plenty, then we went to 120' and that was going to cover us for everything. Now we're using 150' lines and you still have to keep your eyes open".

 

Are the forests of BC maturing to greater heights or have we just gotten smarter. (Obviously we're not talking about Coastal logging operations here).

 

sb

Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer the 120' for doing seismic or bucketing. Just seems like a good length for most of B.C. However one does need the 150 or more in some places for sure. On the coast flying chokers and crew around, I've measured 220 ft Spruce trees in around the pads. Those chokers are a loooong way down there sometimes. If you can get away with it, a 100' bucketing is a good fast length.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...