Jump to content

Another Highland Wreck?


vortex
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am just wondering if the terminology used "Another Highland Wreck" is appropriate in this day and age in the helicopter industry, I would venture to say your language or wording could be a little less ego centric, unless you are of course a perfect person.

 

As always, the other perfect person

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Don, but didn't think there were to many of us perfect people left... :shock:

How about..

 

The Highland Accident?

 

So.....would that be the first one.....the second.....or the third......and so on????

 

You get the idea :down:

 

When you use the term "another" it highlights the fact that this is not the same one, or others, discussed earlier. I see no problem with the terminology. It's just a shame that accidents happen in intervals that can tarnish an operators name, but hey, it's not made up, it's all facts.

there was a year when Canadian had 7 in one year....wow, how would you categorise them??? 7 topics about "The Canadian accident" would be so confusing. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...