3BX2 Posted January 11, 2013 Report Share Posted January 11, 2013 Please explain? Where does it say that ALPINE "held the Government at Bay" on this ruling? As far as I can read, they submitted a proposal and it was deemed acceptable. Where is the evil conspiracy in that? Where does it say that they have a "Free Throw", but "Mom and Pop's Heli Inc" will not get a fair shake? I think you need to step away form the computer, build an "Aluminum Foil" Beanie and hide, as THEY may be coming for you next ! nope, i don't work there, and I'm not afraid of THEM 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over-Talk Posted January 11, 2013 Report Share Posted January 11, 2013 "the laws seeming to have been held at bay?" HUH??? Yeah, please explain that. The important thing to see here is not the approval, BUT that they didn't have their initial proposal(s) approved. Therefore the "governmental body directed to administer the laws" seemed to be administering as they were supposed to. So 'New' Alpine changed their proposal to suit the demands of the CTA, and it was then approved. Due to the spotlight on this case (being shone by the other Operators and HAC), I'm sure the CTA were especially diligent on their research of this application. Not much chance of a 'big company/government' conspiracy on this one. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTR Posted January 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 Understoon - building beanie in process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTR Posted January 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 Really "understood" is what I meant - 2 beanie buildings taking place, I certainly apologize for raising any ire - not what was intended head been drawn back in shell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.