Alpine Helicopters

[3BX2]

Please explain?

 

Where does it say that ALPINE "held the Government at Bay" on this ruling? As far as I can read, they submitted a proposal and it was deemed acceptable. Where is the evil conspiracy in that? Where does it say that they have a "Free Throw", but "Mom and Pop's Heli Inc" will not get a fair shake?

 

I think you need to step away form the computer, build an "Aluminum Foil" Beanie and hide, as THEY may be coming for you next !

 

nope, i don't work there, and I'm not afraid of THEM

[Over-Talk]

"the laws seeming to have been held at bay?"

 

HUH??? Yeah, please explain that.

 

The important thing to see here is not the approval, BUT that they didn't have their initial proposal(s) approved.

Therefore the "governmental body directed to administer the laws" seemed to be administering as they were supposed to.

 

So 'New' Alpine changed their proposal to suit the demands of the CTA, and it was then approved.

Due to the spotlight on this case (being shone by the other Operators and HAC), I'm sure the CTA were especially diligent on their research of this application. Not much chance of a 'big company/government' conspiracy on this one.

[OTR]

Understoon - building beanie in process.

[OTR]

Really "understood" is what I meant - 2 beanie buildings taking place, I certainly apologize for raising any ire - not what was intended head been drawn back in shell.